How I Lead
What a technology executive actually owns
A strong IT manager makes sure the organization runs today. A technology executive decides what it should be running in three years and defends that in dollars. I own the multi-year roadmap, the vendor leverage, the risk story leadership hears, and the growth math — what each new site or service actually costs in network, systems, and staffing.
How I prioritize
Four filters, in order:
- Does it retire regulatory or security risk?
- Does it protect our ability to operate?
- Does it serve growth or the customer?
- Does it make the team more efficient?
Anything that fails all four goes on a visible “not now” list. Saying no is easier when people can see you wrote it down rather than forgot it. A realistic roadmap has four or five real initiatives a year — not fifteen. Fifteen means nothing finishes.
Vendors
Most organizations discover their leverage window after it has closed. I want every critical contract’s term, renewal date, and auto-renew clause known on day one, because ninety days before renewal is the only moment you hold real power.
When a vendor underperforms, the answer is usually not “switch.” Replacing a core platform is enormously expensive and disruptive. The answer is getting what you are already paying for — documented, and escalated on a schedule rather than when you finally get angry.
Risk, explained to people who don’t do this for a living
One page. Three columns: what could happen, what it costs in dollars and customer impact, and what we are doing about it. No acronyms, ranges rather than false precision, and always a recommendation — never a menu.
Ten years of teaching taught me to make hard material land without condescending. My failure mode is over-explaining; I have trained myself to lead with the decision and hold the detail until asked.
Budgets
I split a budget three ways explicitly: keep-the-lights-on, risk reduction, and growth investment. Executives cannot evaluate a blended number, but they can absolutely decide whether $40K to retire an audit finding is worth it, or whether an investment scales the organization for three more locations.
Teams
Nobody should be a single point of failure — for the organization’s resilience and for their own career. That means deliberate cross-training and funded certification. I would rather develop the person I have than replace them. And IT exists to serve the operating departments, not the reverse.
What I’m looking for
A single organization where I own the technology strategy and answer to the chief executive and the board. I have held that altitude before — a $20M budget and a 150-person organization — and I have spent the last decade deliberately acquiring what I was missing then: security depth, governance discipline, and accountability to auditors and funders.
I work best in regulated, vendor-driven environments — places where the technology strategy has to survive an audit, a budget review, and a board presentation. I am not relocating. I live in Salisbury, I have served on the Chamber of Commerce board, and I built a nonprofit here. If I do this well, it is the last job I have.